Feb 03 2012

The New World of Publishing: Following

Published by under On Writing,publishing

There is one really bothersome problem I have noticed a great deal in this new world of publishing we all live in. Writers and some publishers blindly follow someone without ever thinking. They hear a piece of advice, whether it is from this blog, from Konrath’s blog, from a Kindle board, from Publisher’s Marketplace, and they don’t question it. They just follow it blindly, without investigating the truth behind the claim or advice.

I make every effort to not set down rules here, and when I give my opinion, I do my best to back it up with business logic. Sometimes I don’t do a good enough job, I will admit, and sometimes my opinions are so strong they come across as a form of rules. But usually by that point, to be honest, I’m fighting an upstream battle and feel like I have to shout to be heard.

One example of my shouting opinions at the top of my voice is the topic of “agents as publishers.” I believe that in a business sense and legal sense and moral sense an agent turning into a publisher is so damn wrong, I just shout to writers, “Run away!”

That might be a little too over-the-top, but you get the idea. It sounds like a rule, but in reality it’s just my opinion. Every writer is different and if you have figured out a way to make it work with your agent, if you know how your agent will manage to do all the work, if you know how you are going to get paid, then don’t listen to my opinion on the topic. It’s your career. It’s your money.

Some basic beliefs of mine.

— In maybe a hundred different blogs over the years I have stated that there are no rules in this business. And when a person tries to put a rule on you, question it.

— In maybe a hundred different blogs over the years I have stated that every writer is different. But being different doesn’t mean you should just ignore simple, logical business practice.

— In maybe a hundred different blogs over the years I have begged writers to think for themselves, to not follow some trend or another, to step out of the myths and learn business.

For example, I held my opinion for a long time about the Kindle Select because I wanted to investigate the business aspects of it. I have, in my opinion, come to think it’s a horrid deal for writers in 99.9% of the cases. If it wasn’t exclusive, we would be talking another matter.

Another example: Over the past two years I have laughed and snorted and just shaken my head at information coming off the Kindle Boards. There seems to be no way for anyone active on those boards to see the real world beyond the little pool. Yet so many writers see something there and take it as truth and then defend it like their lives depended on it. They make a post by a beginning writer into a rule and then try to live by it.

I’ve been publishing since 1975 and been a publisher, editor and writer all that time. Trust me, never take anything I say as a rule and live by it. All writers are different. Learn to think for yourself, question everything, find your own path. And learn basic business. This is called the “publishing business” for a reason.

But that all said, anyone who has followed this blog for more than a few installments know I can really tilt at a windmill between trying to give practical advice like the Pen Name post or the Think Like a Publisher posts.

Some of my favorite windmills

— Pricing your book into the discount bin. (We’ve had a ton of discussion on that topic and I have another blog coming on pricing that will just start that all over again. Stay tuned.)

— Agent as publisher. (Just too stupid for words in my opinion.)

— Giving your agent all your money and the paperwork for that money before you see any of it. (Just ask yourself if you would do that in the real world with a perfect stranger and you get the idea of how wrong that practice is. And how much it needs to be changed as something common for writers to do with agents.)

— Writers signing contracts that allow a publisher to keep their book for the life of the copyright. (Author can get it back in 35 years, but see my next windmill on that topic.)

— Writers who claim to want to sell their fiction not knowing copyright, thus not even understanding what they are selling. (Actually, you don’t sell copyright, you license it, but most writers don’t even understand that basic a fact. And won’t even bother to spend a few hundred for a IP attorney to look at the contract for them.)

One Last Windmill

I have one last windmill I’m going to add into the mix before the next blog post where I go back to tilting at some more standard windmills and myths by talking about pricing.

Simply put, that windmill is “following blindly.

Question everything, folks. If it doesn’t feel right, even though your English teacher told you to do it, question it. If someone told you that you have to do thirty drafts and it’s boring you to tears, question that process. Some of us only do one draft and do just fine. Other professionals have figured out ways to write with three or four drafts. Ask what a draft is. Ask how long second and third drafts take a writer. And so on. Question.

If you are still sending manuscripts to agents because of guidelines that say, “No unagented submissions,” you really need to question how the system works. And learn it. Editors at publishes buy books and publish them. That’s their job. Give them a chance to see a submission package on your book.

If you think you have to spend a ton of money to indie publish a book, start asking questions. Most of us can electronically publish a book for under $10.00 and if we take it into paper editions, the cost goes up another $25.00. If you think it costs large amounts of money to be an indie publisher, start questioning because you have heard the wrong information.

And so on and so on and so on. Question everything. Stop following and look around and get lots of opinions and learn business and copyright and think for yourself.

A Perfect Illustration

Watch this very, very short, 30 second video a few times and then, when you stop laughing or being insulted, make a resolution to be the person standing on the sidelines laughing instead of in the line.

Enjoy.

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/howaboutthat/9054677/Driver-surrounded-by-sheep-cyclone-becomes-an-online-hit.html

 

(Thanks, Lee, for the pointer.)

 

 

20 responses so far

Jan 29 2012

The New World of Publishing: Pen Names

Published by under On Writing,publishing

I get the “pen name” question more than any other question. Period. And that’s because I am very open about writing under different names and I have varied reasons for doing so. And weirdly enough, I have written under pen names since I started writing.

So after a few more varied questions this last week about pen names in indie publishing, I figured it’s about time I give a full and complete opinion on the topic. But let me be clear here once again.  Ready?

NO WRITER IS THE SAME AS ANOTHER WRITER.

Or as a sign in our workshops say, “You are responsible for your own career.”

Take my opinion on this topic as opinion. Nothing more. Then do what you damn well please because… well, because you can. And should.

History

Pen names have been with fiction writing since the beginning. And the reasons for writers to take pen names is as varied as the writers doing the writing. I’m sure some of you English majors out there could even tell me a bunch of pen names of major literary writers through the centuries. But honestly, please don’t. (grin)

The pulp era of popular fiction brought in thousands and thousands of pen names. There are entire books that have been done trying to track the pen names of the pulp writers, from Max Brand to Kenneth Robison to all the hundreds of pen names of Edward Stratemeyer and his “Syndicate” of writers. (You remember Nancy Drew, The Hardy Boys, and so on.)

Many of today’s major writers wrote under pen names, sometimes many, many pen names over their careers. And almost always for different reasons. I don’t think Robert Silverberg can even count all his pen names. Lawrence Block wrote under many, many names as well, sometimes in the erotic markets of their day. I was at Harlan Ellison’s house one day and asked him off-handedly that if next trip I brought down a copy of Adam Magazine that he had a story in, would he sign it. He laughed and said sure, and he would sign two of the articles in the same issue as well, since he had written those under pen names. I was impressed he remembered.

In fact, in the high peak of science fiction magazines, there were often only one or two writers per issue, even though the magazine showed six or seven authors.

So pen names are nothing new. And the reasons for using a pen name or not using one are varied depending on the author, the time, the publication location, and so much more.

Major Reasons to Use Pen Names

Again, there are thousands of reasons to use pen names, each depending on the author’s situation at the moment.  But let me give you a few of the main ones that have lasted over history.

Top Reason: Writer is too “fast” for traditional publishing.

In other words, the writer has a work ethic and has trained himself to sit at a typewriter or computer for more hours per day. And by doing that, the writer will just produce more work than someone who spends two years writing a novel. Just nature of the beast.

In the pulp era, it was fine to write fast and hard and long under one name. The writers had other reasons to switch names back then that I will get to in a moment.

But with the advent of the influence of the university system and editors coming out of that university myth-filled system, the belief started to sink into the traditional publishing offices that writing more than one or two books per year was a bad thing (except in a few genres like romance). And besides, the big machines of modern traditional publishing just couldn’t keep up with a fast writer. In fact, fast writers just scare hell out of them.

So those of us who have a work ethic and can sit at a computer for a regular work day, we flat had to have more outlets. So instead of putting novels into drawers, we came up with pen names and started many writing careers, often with numbers of them going at once.

At one point, Kris and I were joking around at a conference and actually counted the career income streams coming into our home at that moment in time. We had nine writers’ incomes coming into the house. That was more than we had cats at that point.

Today we have about that many, maybe a few more, but some are not making much, at least not enough to live on. Luckily the pen-name writers don’t eat much.

The key is the same with all aspects of the publishing industry: Diversity and a lot of product. If you have three or four writer’s incomes hitting your house, it’s a ton better and safer than only one. And nine or ten incomes just makes things much easier.

The idea of multiple income streams from different names is not something most writers think of until they happen into it by overwhelming their own publisher and deciding to not slow down (meaning spend less time at the computer or playing Angry Birds) as their agent wants them to do.

However, now with indie publishing, fast writers have far, far more outlets and the idea of being a “fast” writer, meaning spending more hours writing, is once again becoming a good thing. At least outside of traditional publishing. Inside of traditional publishing being fast still scares hell out of people and they will do everything in their power to get you to spend less time being a writer and more time being an author.

Second Major Reason: Help Your Readers While Writing What You Want To Write

This also has been basic from the early days of fiction writing. Readers identify certain types of books by the name of the author. You pick up a Max Brand these days and you expect to get an old-style western. (Max Brand was a pen name of a failed poet.) A Max Brand reader would be very angry if they started to read a Max Brand novel and discovered an old vampire lusting after young girls.

In the pulp era, authors often changed their names when moving to another genre magazine. Only a few major writers that jumped around (such as L. Ron. Hubbard) did not change names much. Writers of that level sold magazines in almost all genres, so editors didn’t want the writer to change the name.

However, the basic reason is that authors get bored easily and want to try new things, new genres, new plots. It’s the rare writer who can write the same story over and over as traditional publishers want them to do. Most of us would rather have teeth pulled than do that. So we write around like a wayward husband and change names on publishers to stay out of their contract traps.

But really, it’s the readers that matter on this one.

My wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch writes under some major names. Her name is known as a science fiction and fantasy writer. And her fantasy series, The Fey, is a dark, high fantasy with lots of blood and death. So when she came up with a light, warm, humorous fantasy series set here and now using fairy tales, she didn’t want to confuse her readers and make the readers that liked one kind of fantasy and not the other angry. So Kristine Grayson, the bestselling paranormal romance writer, was born for the funny fantasy books.

Then Kris came up with a dark mystery series set in the late 1960s that dealt with race and politics of the time. Again, not something her normal science fiction readers would enjoy, so multiple-Edgar-nominated Kris Nelscott was born. And now in romance this next year she has a wonderful science fiction romance series starting out of Sourcebooks under the name Kris DeLake. Pure space opera with a romance touch. But again the readers that love Recovering Apollo 8 or the gritty Diving into the Wreck series would not be very happy. Thus the new author is born.

You want a more major example than my wife? How about Evan Hunter, which was a pen name. Evan Hunter wrote a book called The Blackboard Jungle that won some major awards such as the Pulitzer Prize. But he was a writer, and wanted to write other stuff.  He got an offer to write a new series for a paperback house that needed short novels fast. So he created a new name and wrote police procedural novels for decades under the name Ed McBain.  Also, Evan Hunter, to help pay for a girlfriend or some such thing now lost in publishing lore, wrote soft-core erotica quickly, often finishing a book in a day or so, to help pay dating costs. Of course, those books were also under other names.

So writers, help your readers find a book they will enjoy because they read an earlier one like it. I know it’s alien for writers to think about helping out readers, but the more you do, the more fans you get and the more readers over time. It really is that simple.

Also, I suppose I should say something right here about “branding” your books and name or pen name. In other words, indie publishers, if you have a pen name, make all the stories and pen names under that name seem similar in covers and look, yet be different enough from book to book. That also helps readers. If you don’t know what I’m talking about here, go study branding because it will help you in publishing.

I’ll talk in a minute about keeping pen names secret or not. 99% of the time there is no reason to, so if the reader of your fun fantasy wants to read a blood-and-guts fantasy and you are clear you write that under that other name, let them be able to find it on your main web site.

Third Major Reason: You Have A Difficult Day Job

This reason is just obvious. You are an MD and you are writing medical thrillers. Really good plan to do that under a pen name to save legal problems with some patient believing you took their personal information and put it in your book, even though you didn’t.

And yes I know about Michael Crichton writing his way through medical school. Under pen names. He wrote under the names John Lange and Jeffrey Hudson and one of the books under one of those names won the Edgar Award for best novel.  He wrote numbers of novels per year all the way through med school, all under pen names, and got his MD the year he wrote three novels. (Yeah, you don’t have enough time to write.) By the way, his real first name was John.

Another example: James Tiptree Jr. was a long-term spy in the Second World War and in the Cold War, a CIA agent, and an experimental psychologist, so she came up with a very hidden pen name to write under. Her real name was Alice Sheldon, but everyone swore Tiptree was a man for a very long time.

Some Other Smaller Reasons to Change Your Writing Name

– Sales Record Goes Bad.

In traditional publishing, your sales record is tracked by your name. You write a book and something goes wrong along the way, often through no fault of your own, and your sales numbers go down and you can’t sell another book under that name.

Smart writers change their name and keep writing. Authors, on the other hand, sit in bars at conventions and complain they can’t sell a book.

So bad sales record in traditional publishing is one reason. That makes no difference at all in indie publishing. In indie publishing, writers publish the book and let the numbers of readers grow slowly over time.  In traditional publishing, they have to gamble that your book will sell a certain number in a certain amount of time. Remember the produce model? In traditional publishing, your books spoil, so if they paid you too much in comparison to your sales numbers, you can’t sell another book UNDER THAT NAME.

Change your name and move on. Or move to indie publishing.

– Family Issues.

Sometimes some writers just don’t want their mother stumbling across that erotic book they wrote. Do that under a pen name if you have that issue. Or if you hate your parents and don’t want to give them credit for anything.

– Future Divorce

Women, caution on using your husband’s name as your writing name. Writing careers often outlast marriages. Just saying…

– Your Real Name is Stephen King

Let me think… Oh, yeah, write under a pen name. That name is taken.

– You Think Your Story Sucks

Writers are the worst judges of their own work, but alas, we all still have strong opinions of our work when finished. So when you write a story that sucks in your belief as a writer and you wouldn’t want anyone to see it under your main name, sell it under a pen name. This is becoming very easy in indie publishing. And has been a standard practice since the beginning of publishing. You might be surprised how well your bad story sells. Let the readers decide.

– You are writing a Work-For-Hire Series.

Fine to do some under your main writing name, but caution on writing too many and getting know for doing them only. I am still known as a Star Trek writer even though I haven’t written one Star Trek book in almost a decade. Do you know I wrote Star Trek under seven different names? I’ll give you Dean Wesley Smith and Sandy Schofield. The other five you Trek buffs can figure out if you want to waste time for a trivia contest.

Better to just do work-for-hire or media under a pen name from the start. Trust me on this one.

As I said, there are thousands and thousands of reasons for writers to write under pen names. Most make great sense to the writer. But now let me talk about the elephant in the room with this topic. Ready?

Ego

So many writers deep down are out to be famous. And they want their own name to be the famous name. So the idea of changing their name is just alien for any reason, no matter how much it makes business sense to do so. I’ve seen many, many, many writers just give up writing completely because they would not change their name and something stopped their books from selling.

This issue seems to be much, much worse for men than women. Women are raised to think they might change their name at some point in the future in a wedding. But men have this ego-thing about their name. Men, get over it.

For some reason I’ve never had that problem. No idea why not.  For me, when I walk into a store and see a book I wrote, either under this name or one I wrote for a major bestseller as a ghost novel, I know it’s my book. And that’s all that matters to me.

I walked into Safeway grocery store one night and saw three of my books there on the rack. One a media book with this name on it, one a ghost novel, and one a western under a series author name.  Fantastic fun. I didn’t need to show anyone or run up-and-down-the-aisles shouting what I had just done.  I just stood there for a moment staring at the three books, smiling.

Then I went home and went back to writing.

So before you start writing under other names, check the ego at the door. Evan Hunter is a pen name. At an Edgar Awards ceremony a number of years back he was the keynote speaker. In front of his plate was a name-tag that read “Evan Hunter.”  When the person doing the announcements called his name to come and speak, he introduced him as Ed McBain. Salvator Albert Lombino still stood up.

If you have ego issues, just stay with one name. And never ghost-write a book.

Indie Publishing Issues

Indie writers who are in a great hurry are usually the ones that ask me about pen names.  One of the truths of indie publishing is that if you have more products under one name, readers can find you easier and if they like a story they buy, they will buy more. And thus having more books and stories published leads to more sales. That is one fact most of us agree on about indie publishing.

But….  All those stories and books need to be in the same general area. If you write a vampire novel followed by a romance with rabbit-sex followed by a private detective novel, all under the same name, you are going to lose readers, not find more. So if you are moving across genres like that in your writing, you are going to need to realize that it’s going to take more time to build an audience. Because you are going to be building more than one career. Of course that takes more time. Duh.

That means as a beginning writer you are going to have to do what seems almost impossible to do. You are going to have to take the long view, meaning not just six months, but six years or more. (Please don’t scream at me. I’m being nice suggesting only six years. More than likely it’s ten years or more, just as it was in the old traditional-publishing-only days.)

I have no issue with a writer telling their readers they also write other kinds of novels under other names. I just told you about four of my wife’s names she writes in different genres. And sometimes readers will follow across genre lines. Give them the chance on a main web site under a main name.

Some Answers to Basic Questions

How do you create a pen name?

Simple. Put it under the title and put it in the author slots on the different sites. Have all the money go to your real banking name. In traditional publishing, on your manuscript, you put your real name where the check is sent in the upper left-hand corner of the manuscript with your address. You put your pen name under the title. It really is that simple. No need to set up any kind of legal anything.

How about copyright under a pen name?

If you ask this question you need to buy a copy of The Copyright Handbook at once. It’s from NoLo Press. Go buy it now.

But the short answer is copyright protection vests in the words as you commit them to a form, meaning as you write them down or type them onto a screen. The form of everything you write automatically has copyright protection and does not matter what name you publish it under. If you are worried, spend the extra money to get your copyright registered. But for heaven’s sake, go learn copyright.

Do I have to keep my pen name secret?

Up to you. I wouldn’t unless you have issues with your family or are a medical professional. Or unless you signed a legal document agreeing to not disclose the name. (I have signed many, many of those documents.) But if you are just starting a new name to help readers stay clear on which genre they are reading, I can see no reason to keep a pen name secret.

Should I have a web site for each pen name?

Of course. Author name is the most important selling tool you have over time. So before you invent a new name, make sure no one else is writing under that name and then go get the domain. When you go in search of the domain, don’t hesitate, just spend the ten bucks and buy it. Otherwise someone will grab it because it has interest in the search engines.

But at the same time don’t be silly and think you have to blog on the site and work it all the time. Just use it as a static web site where readers can get to your books or back to your main web site. That’s all you use it for. It’s an advertising site.

You want to see an example of a static web site for my Dee W. Schofield pen name?  Go to http://www.deewschofield.com/. There’s even a free story there. And notice the bio and picture. That’s a picture of me about two years old standing on a hood of a car.

Should I make up a fake bio for my pen name?

No need unless it’s going to be very secret, but then be careful. Better to say less or nothing about the author.

Do you need to do some branding of each pen name?

I would certainly try. Use the same font on the covers, use the same basic design, same type of art, that sort of thing. Anything to give the reader a feeling that you are sort of paying attention to stories being similar. I would do this more for novels than short stories. If you can’t or don’t understand branding, don’t worry about it. Minor at first.

There are many other minor questions about pen names, many I’m sure will get answered in the comments section.

Summary

Again, there are thousands of reasons to use a pen name. None are wrong.

For me, I’ve used pen names for business because I was writing someone else’s novel for them. I’ve used pen names on work-for-hire novels, I’ve used pen names in different genres. I’ve used pen names to write erotica. I’ve used pen names when my wife and I wrote together. And sometimes I used a pen name just for fun.  Why? Because I could, that’s why.

As a beginning writer, I had the silly idea that “Smith” was a bad name to write under, so I wrote stories under Wesley Dean. One very long day at Damon Knight’s house, he spent the entire day going out of his way to call me all the variations of “Wes” and “Wesley” and “Wesser” and so on. By the end of the day, even though the name was fine, I had decided I didn’t want to spend the rest of my life answering to that name. It just didn’t fit in my mind as a name for me. I went back to my real name after that day, but I had already sold four or five stories under that name. I got a couple of them changed before they were published.

And now when I pick a pen name, I imagine being called that name for the rest of my life.

So basically what I am saying about pen names is this:

There are no rules. Do what you want.

But if your ego stops you from starting a new name when you should for business reasons, then there are repercussions. As I said before, the simple desire to stick with a certain name has killed many, many writing careers. But those people, in my opinion, were not writers. They were authors.

Writers are people who write and don’t much care which name their writing appears under. They only care that they can keep writing and that readers in one fashion or another get a chance to read what they write.

And trust me, it was great fun to walk into that Safeway grocery store and see three of my books on the same paperback rack. Great fun. But if I had been so wrapped up in my own ego that I couldn’t write under another name, that moment would have never have happened.

So when deciding about which name to publish a book or story under, think first of your readers.

Then think about your readers some more.

And then decide which name would be best for them. And which name you can live with the rest of your life.

And then have fun.

————————————————

Copyright © 2012 Dean Wesley Smith

Cover art copyright Philcold/Dreamstime
————————————————–

This chapter is now part of my inventory in my Magic Bakery.  I’m giving you this small slice as a sample. I’m giving you a taste, but not selling any of the pie.

If you feel this helped you in any way, toss a tip into the tip jar on the way out of the Magic Bakery.

If you can’t afford to donate, please feel free to pass this chapter along to others who might get some help from it.

And I would like to thank all the fine folks who have donated over this last year. The donations and the comments both after the posts and privately are really keeping me going on this. Thanks!

Tip Jar: Go To Paypal

109 responses so far

Jan 29 2012

A Great Post About Social Networds

Published by under On Writing,publishing

Susan Kiernan-Lewis does a great post trashing the idea of using social networks to sell books and it is well-reasoned and well-written. Worth the read, folks.

She is wrong about me and Konrath and Eisler and Meyer. She thinks our celebrity helps us sell books. As Joe said, we write here for writers, who don’t buy books. My bestselling books are under names none of you would associate with this blog, that’s for sure. (grin)  So she is correct, our books sell because of the books, not who the author is behind them.

But besides that slip at the end of her blog, it’s a great read. And something I agree with. Social media to sell books is a waste of time. (I’ll be back this evening with a post about pen names. Stay tuned. But first go read Susan’s blog.)

http://susankiernanlewis.wordpress.com/2012/01/28/the-great-social-media-flim-flam/

33 responses so far

Jan 26 2012

Don’t Forget Real Readers

My wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, on her blog today called “The Business Rusch” did a great post I feel is important for all writers to read.

It’s about not forgetting readers. Publishers are doing so and writers tend to do so as well. If you want to talk about her post and are afraid to do it on her site, come back here and discuss it. That’s fine. But read it.

And you might want to read the comments there as well. Interesting stuff.

http://kriswrites.com/2012/01/25/the-business-rusch-readers/

24 responses so far

Jan 26 2012

Even More Real Data

Verso did a very good and pretty solid study on e-reading public, buying new devices, and resistance to even buying a reading device.  Some fantastic data in this new study.

One thing I find interesting is that over the last year the resistance to reading fiction on a device has grown to around 50% of all book readers.

Basically, what that means is that indie publishers must use all methods to get their work to readers. I poke fun at the writers who think Kindle is the only place, but I haven’t been shouting much at the writers who don’t bother to go into paper as well with their novels. And by not doing so, they are missing 50% of the reading public.

Anyhow, another fantastic study with real data. And they put how they did the study and the details on the first page. Worth a read. Again, simple to read and understand with great charts.

http://www.versoadvertising.com/DBWsurvey2012/

39 responses so far

Jan 26 2012

Real Data

Published by under On Writing,publishing

As I was asking some writers in the comments a few posts ago to back up their claims of fact with real data, Nielsen in Great Britain was doing just such a study.

Amazing stuff. What they did was first look at sales both online and offline to traditional stores of books that have what they consider basic metadata. They have ten areas such as cover, publisher, author name, book price, and so on that they consider basic information. When even one of those pieces is missing from the sales description, sales drop.

Then they added in extra factors such as long descriptions vs short descriptions, reviews, and so on. And they did this over both fiction, children’s books, nonfiction and so on. What is interesting is that reviews on a book mean the least and do not affect sales much at all except possibly in negative ways. Stunning.

And long descriptions help fiction and short descriptions help children’s fiction more.

Worth the read through the study. It’s easy to read with lots of very clear graphs and charts. Make sure you read their summary at the bottom. It’s short and to the point.

Just go to the following page and click on the link.

http://www.nielsenbookdata.co.uk/controller.php?page=1129

33 responses so far

Jan 25 2012

A Report From Digital Book World

In case you haven’t been following the reports on Publisher’s Marketplace, Digital Book World conference is going on right now in New York.  And Bob Meyer is there and speaking.  His two write-ups are worth the read.

http://writeitforward.wordpress.com/

And once again he said something I have heard him say before, but let me quote him here because I agree completely.

Bob Meyer said in his blog,

“In the interest of being controversial, let me restate my feeling about digital publishing: Authors produce the product.  Readers consume the product.  Everyone else:  Lead, Follow or Get The Hell Out of the Way.”

Read his reports on Digital Book World.

6 responses so far

Jan 25 2012

A Number Of Things I Am Confused About

Published by under On Writing,publishing

Here are a list of things I just get confused about, that I don’t have answers to, and that I thought I would just toss out into the air.

— I am confused at why a writer gets happy when they give their book away for free and a lot of people take it. They make the same amount of money as when one person takes it, and less than if one person buys it.

— I get very confused when a free book hits a “bestseller” list. When a book is given away free, it isn’t sold, thus can’t be on a “bestseller” list. Maybe a “bestfree” list or “bestgift” list, but not a “bestseller” list.

— I get very confused when a beginning writer (after finishing and publishing just one book) is upset they are not making any money from that one book. The key word is “beginning.”  I believe the writer should be happy if the writer’s family and friends buy it and pretend to have read it. But over and over I hear of writers with one book published being upset that they are not making a million bucks. I have a hundred novels published and I don’t make a million bucks.

— I get very confused when a writer with one book indie published is upset that no one is finding their one solo book among the millions published.

— I get very confused when a writer with a few hundred friends on Facebook and Twitter thinks that repeating the publication of their book over and over and over and over will make them more than a handful of sales. And fewer friends.

— I get very confused when a writer swears they want to make a living from their craft, yet never mail anything, never finish anything, and never publish anything. And just can’t find the time that often to write as well.

— I get very confused when someone gets mad at me for suggesting they value their book above the bargain bin pricing. I don’t care about their book, I honestly don’t. It was just a suggestion, but clearly suggesting that their novel has worth above a candy bar is something that makes some writers very angry. (I get this one a great deal, actually and it never makes sense.)

— And finally, I get very confused when new writers think that I didn’t have to work day jobs when I started and didn’t have to learn craft and didn’t have to fail over and over and over for years and years before I sold something.

I don’t expect answers. I don’t believe there really are answers. But I just thought I’d get out what I get confused over and over about.

And yes, I am getting older so I get confused very easy these days.

ADDED NOTES

From the comments I got some more things I now remember being confused about.

Sarah Stegall added three:

I get confused by writers who have been rewriting the same novel for ten years, who still seek advice. What could possibly be left to say?

I get confused by people who hear that you’ve published *a* book and wonder why you’re not on tour.

I get confused by agents and editors who say they’re looking for something “unique” and then ask you to rewrite your novel to read more like Janet Evanovich.

Yup, those confuse me as well.

And J.A. Konrath added even more places I am confused and forgot about.

I’ll add I get very confused when people dismiss self-pubbing or legacy pubbing without any research or experience to back-up their opinions.

I get very confused by the outpouring of hostility when I share information, ideas, and personal experience about publishing, esp. when these angry people offer no counter arguments.

I get very confused why legacy publishing keeps making mistake after mistake in regard to ebooks, yet somehow believes it will survive.

I also get very confused why the majority of people would rather defend their beliefs to the death rather than change their mind.

Thanks for the great comments and discussions… And Sarah and Joe, thanks for adding to my confusion. (grin)

131 responses so far

Jan 20 2012

You Don’t Need To Be a Bestseller

Folks, not only is the message to go slow and let your books grow coming from me, but my wife, Kristine Kathryn Rusch, just did a blog about bestsellers.

The Bestseller Lists and Other Thoughts.

And this morning Joe Konrath did a blog about not needing to be a bestseller called “The Myth of the Bestseller.”  You can read it at http://jakonrath.blogspot.com/2012/01/myth-of-bestseller.html

What Joe said at the end of his message really, really strikes home.  He said:

“Bestsellers? Fuck bestsellers.

Don’t let me, the NYT Times, or the pinheads in legacy publishing make you feel inadequate because you aren’t a millionaire yet.

You are part of a revolution that is going to change how the entire world reads. 

Your ebooks will continue to earn money, forever. 

Be proud. You are a success.”

I could not have said it any better or any clearer.

23 responses so far

Jan 19 2012

You Don’t Need Publicity

Published by under On Writing,publishing

J.A. Konrath finally said in a very clear fashion what I have been saying over and over and over. Forget publicity on your books, forget being an “author” and work on writing better books and more of them.

Don’t believe me. Go read Joe’s new blog on this topic.

http://jakonrath.blogspot.com/2012/01/value-of-publicity.html

19 responses so far

Next »

asus