<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killing the Sacred Cows of Publishing: Rewriting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=329" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:56:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dwsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>dwsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Just remember, no right way of doing this, just stay in creative voice, creative mode when tampering beyond fixing typos and that sort of thing and you will keep your story fresh, original, and in your own voice. 

Just think of a stone. Editors want unique stones.  But if you polish all the edges off, it looks just like every other polished rock and there&#039;s no reason for an editor to buy it.  And have fun.  Writing is a ton of fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just remember, no right way of doing this, just stay in creative voice, creative mode when tampering beyond fixing typos and that sort of thing and you will keep your story fresh, original, and in your own voice. </p>
<p>Just think of a stone. Editors want unique stones.  But if you polish all the edges off, it looks just like every other polished rock and there&#8217;s no reason for an editor to buy it.  And have fun.  Writing is a ton of fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megs - Scattered Bits</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-2775</link>
		<dc:creator>Megs - Scattered Bits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 18:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-2775</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m generally a two-drafter: Asimov&#039;s method. Except when I redraft, in which I retain HUGE chunks of the original but use them as movable, editable clippings vs. mainline text. After that, I solely fix the occasional typo I locate later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m generally a two-drafter: Asimov&#8217;s method. Except when I redraft, in which I retain HUGE chunks of the original but use them as movable, editable clippings vs. mainline text. After that, I solely fix the occasional typo I locate later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Baldwin</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Baldwin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>Man, this is great.

It makes me feel better about my first novel too. Wrote the thing, then redrafted it twice - because I couldn&#039;t rewrite, it just wouldn&#039;t happen. When I did figure out how to rewrite, the last version just got worse thereafter. Of course it was terrible to begin with - first novel - so it was good to learn what I could and couldn&#039;t do. But, yeah, it&#039;s amazing how easy it is to ruin a story with rewriting.

I don&#039;t know that I agree entirely about rewriting at all though - it seems like maybe if you&#039;ve got an extra scene or something you didn&#039;t need, because you wrote it one just like it earlier in the story or some-such, then excising the scene can be worth doing if it won&#039;t muck up what you&#039;ve written. And I also have found over the years that I can come back and rewrite in a *creative* mode, not a critical one, sometimes in some places - but what comes out in a white hot fury seems to come out so much more interestingly than what I&#039;d gain from a rewrite&#039;s cleaning up consistency issues etc. Anyway, great to hear a multi-multi-volume seller say this. And I have to get back to practicing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, this is great.</p>
<p>It makes me feel better about my first novel too. Wrote the thing, then redrafted it twice &#8211; because I couldn&#8217;t rewrite, it just wouldn&#8217;t happen. When I did figure out how to rewrite, the last version just got worse thereafter. Of course it was terrible to begin with &#8211; first novel &#8211; so it was good to learn what I could and couldn&#8217;t do. But, yeah, it&#8217;s amazing how easy it is to ruin a story with rewriting.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know that I agree entirely about rewriting at all though &#8211; it seems like maybe if you&#8217;ve got an extra scene or something you didn&#8217;t need, because you wrote it one just like it earlier in the story or some-such, then excising the scene can be worth doing if it won&#8217;t muck up what you&#8217;ve written. And I also have found over the years that I can come back and rewrite in a *creative* mode, not a critical one, sometimes in some places &#8211; but what comes out in a white hot fury seems to come out so much more interestingly than what I&#8217;d gain from a rewrite&#8217;s cleaning up consistency issues etc. Anyway, great to hear a multi-multi-volume seller say this. And I have to get back to practicing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex J. Kane</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-1783</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex J. Kane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-1783</guid>
		<description>Great article. I came to this sort of mindset recently once I began sending off several short works to different potential publishers. You quickly realize that, once you&#039;ve sent a few of your babies off to war, they&#039;ll do just fine (or, maybe they won&#039;t). The important thing is that you do whatever you can to prepare them. The three-draft process of first draft/adding-in (or taking out)/polishing is a pattern I find to be quick and satisfying; it also allows the work room to breathe for its own sake. There is a lot of discussion about how too much revision leeches the life out of a story, and I believe this to be quite true.

I too, am a &quot;putter-inner,&quot; typing with full-throttle speed through my first drafts, then coming back to find that a few of the ideas, thoughts, or even scenes that I had intended to write I actually forgot about in my haste. And going back, adding them in, then rereading the draft, you can&#039;t tell the difference--it just makes the story better. So long as you don&#039;t over-edit.

I&#039;m really loving these myth-busting essays, Mr. Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article. I came to this sort of mindset recently once I began sending off several short works to different potential publishers. You quickly realize that, once you&#8217;ve sent a few of your babies off to war, they&#8217;ll do just fine (or, maybe they won&#8217;t). The important thing is that you do whatever you can to prepare them. The three-draft process of first draft/adding-in (or taking out)/polishing is a pattern I find to be quick and satisfying; it also allows the work room to breathe for its own sake. There is a lot of discussion about how too much revision leeches the life out of a story, and I believe this to be quite true.</p>
<p>I too, am a &#8220;putter-inner,&#8221; typing with full-throttle speed through my first drafts, then coming back to find that a few of the ideas, thoughts, or even scenes that I had intended to write I actually forgot about in my haste. And going back, adding them in, then rereading the draft, you can&#8217;t tell the difference&#8211;it just makes the story better. So long as you don&#8217;t over-edit.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m really loving these myth-busting essays, Mr. Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-1676</link>
		<dc:creator>dwsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 20:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-1676</guid>
		<description>Chris, more than welcome. You are right, find what works for you for any project, what creates selling fiction. But remember one thing. Every project is different, just as every writer is different. Don&#039;t force a project into one mold when it wants and needs to be in another. Just as don&#039;t allow these myths to force you into a mold you don&#039;t want to be in either. Thanks for the comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, more than welcome. You are right, find what works for you for any project, what creates selling fiction. But remember one thing. Every project is different, just as every writer is different. Don&#8217;t force a project into one mold when it wants and needs to be in another. Just as don&#8217;t allow these myths to force you into a mold you don&#8217;t want to be in either. Thanks for the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 09:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>Thank you, I thought I was weird.  All over the internet people cry &quot;Rewrite, rewrite and throw-away,&quot; and I was left thinking... &quot;I can&#039;t be the only one who rewrites and ADDS, can I?&quot;

Wasn&#039;t bothered if I was - the way I write works for me, but still, thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I thought I was weird.  All over the internet people cry &#8220;Rewrite, rewrite and throw-away,&#8221; and I was left thinking&#8230; &#8220;I can&#8217;t be the only one who rewrites and ADDS, can I?&#8221;</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t bothered if I was &#8211; the way I write works for me, but still, thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sadler</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-1374</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-1374</guid>
		<description>After reading the rest of your chapter/posts... (all 14 at this point) though I stroked my ego for feeling the &#039;comfort of agreement&#039;, I have learned so much!  Finally, I would not be here if I did not desire to keep learning, keep searching for knowledge.  And yes, I know so little.  Thanks for the knowledge boost!  I will look forward to the next post and to recommending and buying the finished book.

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the rest of your chapter/posts&#8230; (all 14 at this point) though I stroked my ego for feeling the &#8216;comfort of agreement&#8217;, I have learned so much!  Finally, I would not be here if I did not desire to keep learning, keep searching for knowledge.  And yes, I know so little.  Thanks for the knowledge boost!  I will look forward to the next post and to recommending and buying the finished book.</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Sadler</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Sadler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>Dean... wow!  Just found your site and have been reading your de-myth-efying chapter articles and feeling much &#039;smarter&#039;.  So far, your veil-lifting is revealing knowledge I believed from my own experience, but may not yet have had the specific experience to have  known &#039;it&#039; for-a-fact.  How comforting to have someone to agree with rather than argue with about re-writing, etc.  Thank you for your insights, they are very much appreciated.  I will be sending others here!

All the best,
Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dean&#8230; wow!  Just found your site and have been reading your de-myth-efying chapter articles and feeling much &#8217;smarter&#8217;.  So far, your veil-lifting is revealing knowledge I believed from my own experience, but may not yet have had the specific experience to have  known &#8216;it&#8217; for-a-fact.  How comforting to have someone to agree with rather than argue with about re-writing, etc.  Thank you for your insights, they are very much appreciated.  I will be sending others here!</p>
<p>All the best,<br />
Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dwsmith</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-618</link>
		<dc:creator>dwsmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 07:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-618</guid>
		<description>Rob, just stop doing it. That simple. And read a couple of my recent posts about motivation and fear.

Follow Heinlein&#039;s Rules and you&#039;ll have it solid. 

I have a couple other posts about rewriting over the last year. All your questions are answered in detail there and in the comments afterwards.  Keep firing.

Cheers
Dean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob, just stop doing it. That simple. And read a couple of my recent posts about motivation and fear.</p>
<p>Follow Heinlein&#8217;s Rules and you&#8217;ll have it solid. </p>
<p>I have a couple other posts about rewriting over the last year. All your questions are answered in detail there and in the comments afterwards.  Keep firing.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Dean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329&#038;cpage=1#comment-614</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deanwesleysmith.com/?p=329#comment-614</guid>
		<description>Way late to this party, but when I saw this I nearly screeched with glee. I HATE rewriting, but have been fed the myth that &quot;writing = rewriting&quot; for so long, my writing process now resembles a legless blind man in a bicycle race. Not pretty.

I would like to try pulling back on the revision, but there is this horrible fear that I will produce crapola.

A couple of things I worry about (especially if you&#039;re running without an outline) is what happens when you come to a part in the story where it demands information you don&#039;t know and need to research? Do you stop the writing process to get the info? Or do you do what Stephen Kind does and &quot;make it up&quot; for first draft, and fix it in second draft? (The way you describe your process, this latter does not sound like what you would do.)

Also, what about any major plot changes you realize you need to make halfway through the writing? Do you stop and make revisions before moving forward? Take care of that in the second draft? Or does this sort of thing not happen to you? Seems to happen to me more often than I&#039;d like.

Despite my questions (and I&#039;ll probably have more come to me at about 3 AM) I would give my first-born to eliminate the &quot;required&quot; revision process. I have too many stories I want to write and this could save me a great deal of time and agony.

Cheers,
Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way late to this party, but when I saw this I nearly screeched with glee. I HATE rewriting, but have been fed the myth that &#8220;writing = rewriting&#8221; for so long, my writing process now resembles a legless blind man in a bicycle race. Not pretty.</p>
<p>I would like to try pulling back on the revision, but there is this horrible fear that I will produce crapola.</p>
<p>A couple of things I worry about (especially if you&#8217;re running without an outline) is what happens when you come to a part in the story where it demands information you don&#8217;t know and need to research? Do you stop the writing process to get the info? Or do you do what Stephen Kind does and &#8220;make it up&#8221; for first draft, and fix it in second draft? (The way you describe your process, this latter does not sound like what you would do.)</p>
<p>Also, what about any major plot changes you realize you need to make halfway through the writing? Do you stop and make revisions before moving forward? Take care of that in the second draft? Or does this sort of thing not happen to you? Seems to happen to me more often than I&#8217;d like.</p>
<p>Despite my questions (and I&#8217;ll probably have more come to me at about 3 AM) I would give my first-born to eliminate the &#8220;required&#8221; revision process. I have too many stories I want to write and this could save me a great deal of time and agony.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
